Immortal
FIRST LOOK PICTURES
| List Price: |
$14.98 |
| Amazon Price: |
$12.99 |
| Lowest New Price: |
$6.81 |
| Lowest Used Price: |
$5.22 |
| Total New: |
40 |
| Total Used: |
26 |
DVD Details:
- Starring: Linda Hardy (II), Thomas Kretschmann, Charlotte Rampling, Frédéric Pierrot, Thomas M. Pollard
- Director: Enki Bilal
- Format: Closed-captioned, Color, DVD-Video, NTSC
- Rated: R (Restricted)
- Studio: FIRST LOOK PICTURES
- Theatrical Release Date: Jan 09, 2009
- DVD Release Date: Jun 21, 2005
- Run Time: 102 minutes
- ASIN: B0008ENI0W
- UPC: 687797109590
- Sales Rank: 15469
Amazon Customer Reviews:
3 of 3 people found the following review helpful:
0 of 1 people found the following review helpful:
    Not Cooked Long Enough, 2008-10-25
I saw this movie some time ago on cable and jotted some notes down...
br /
br /'Immortal' suffers from wanting to be Blade Runner. The tie-in to Ancient Egypt and their pantheon was interesting but I missed how that made any sense.
br /
br /A hi-tech hourglass ticks away. What does the cat goddess think of Horace's procreative trysts?
br /
br /Intricate plot that is vague somehow. Dialogue written by 'B'-level college creative writing students. CGI characters all look like more like cartoons/anime except for the 'immortals' who didn't seem to fit with the animal heads. Hot bodies, though, for unrated film, they didn't need to cover up Horace's privates. Romance between the 'hero' and the lead female was too forced (literally). Seemed to make light of rape.
br /
br /The exchanges between the main character guy and Horace were overlong and it was never clear how Horace inhabits him. The doctor (?) female pursuing the alien female protagonist seemed to have zilch character development. Then there was the inexplicable series of shark/squid-like villain accoutrements that were laughably ineffective, though they looked cool in their evil way.
br /
br /The main problem with the film is that the emphasis really is on surfaces and the 'stylized future reality bit', rather than a story. It reminded me of latter day George Lucas, where the plot gets sketchy, the dialogue gets more stilted, the humor scarce, but everything looks and sounds really cool.
br /
br /Immortal is sexy, or at least tries, but the reasons it's sexy seems to be to keep focus away from the half-baked plot. The story line gets lost in the jumbled script, half-mentioned, and unfocused. Horace wants to procreate? So he takes over the male protag's body?
br /
br /The whole thing would've made a great, highly stylized porn movie, but it's obvious they wanted to spice up the story with sex but didn't want to bother with the messiness of making the story at all sexual or make the sexual make sense.
br /
br /Overall, the movie 'outcools' itself by looking good while saying very little. Blade Runner, though highly stylized, defined a genre of future Earth depictions white tell a very compelling story about the core nature of what it means to be human and, ultimately, the nature of immortality.
br /
br /'Immortal', on the other hand, is an ancient Egypt fanclub flick, part cartoon, part real that looks simultaneously slick and, at times, ridiculous (Horace talks out of his throat and I swear I could see an actor's eyes peering through his beak at one point).
br /
br /Given another year or so of massaging, editing, and developing the script, effects, etc. the would make an interesting film, but the kernel of the story focuses on Horace rather than the couple who are.. spoiler alert....
br /
br /
br /
br /
br /
br /
br /getting back together at the end (ironically, sine she has lost her memory - yet again).
br /
br /Too many gimmicks, magic pills and magic powers make this movie a two star joint.
br /
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful:
    Why Does Horus Suddenly Appear?, 2008-08-25
The Good Things
br /*Very excellent special effects. Visual imagery is so spectacular throughout the film that it is hardly ever dull (even though there's no real action to it).
br /*Good filming style with lots of vivid imagery.
br /*Excellent production design. Lots of funky sets, costumes, props, and loads of really cool flying cars.
br /*Fascinating characters. Lots of emotion; good acting and pretty good writing.
br /*Very interesting concepts throughout. Some content concerning eugenics. Some parts seem to question the definition of humanity.
br /*Good music.
br /
br /The Bad Things
br /*Rather strange, somewhat confusing story. Definately warrants multiple viewings, however.
br /*Gets a little slow at some parts.
br /*Not for kids or the extremely squeamish; contains bloody violence, swearing, nudity, and sex.
br /
br /The Questionable Things
br /*I don't get why so many characters were completely computer-generated; it seemed to make everything look more fake and confusing.
br /
br /Easily comparable to "The Fifth Element," but I consider this to be a little superior in many ways. "Immortal" is what science fiction should be about; intriguing visions of the future and of other worlds. It's also got some deep content concerning the nature of humanity. The storyline suffers from being a little too strange, confusing, and slow at parts, but I was very pleased with the visuals and the emotions of the characters. If you're interested in good sci-fi, I'd reccomend at least renting this.
br /
br /The DVD has excellent video and sound quality (the video is just a little grainy, but it adds to the overall grittiness of the film). It includes a thirty-minute making-of feature and a couple of trailers. The copy I have came in an awesome metal steelbook case.
br /
br /If this review has not been helpful, let me know how I can improve for the future.
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful:
|
|