The Da Vinci Code (Widescreen Two-Disc Special Edition)

0 of 0 people found the following review helpful:

Why a different movie in the states than was released overseas?, 2008-11-25
Can someone please explain to me why the movie released overseas was 35 minutes longer and contained the movie scenes that would have actually allowed the screen version to make as much sense as the book? I was so lucky to have seen the extended version, but was quite angry and frustrated to find that I cannot purchase it anywhere in the USA or on a disc that can actually be played on a DVD player from the United States. And people actually think we have freedom here in America. You are only kidding yourselves if you believe that.

0 of 1 people found the following review helpful:

Great movie and great price, 2008-10-13
I baught this movie for me wife and we both love it. It's fast paced, yet very cerebral.

0 of 1 people found the following review helpful:

questions, 2008-09-08
It`s a movie, that left us believing Jesus Is so much more, in every way.

1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:

Good movie, 2008-08-23
I have just watched the DVD Da Vinci Code.I was aware of the fuss and bother that went with the film including one remark that someone did not like Tom Hanks hair it was too long! I cannot remember the last time I actually sat down and watched a film and was entertained. All religious/political reasons etc have to be put on one side and take the film as it was, pure entertainment and a jolly good viewing. I congratulate Ron Howard on his film, he has come a long way since Ritchie Cunningham on Happy Days. I just do not know what else to say about this film it was just fantastic and I advise everyone to watch it. There are some jarring scenes, including Silas' self-mortification and some of the murders--but what's a good "who dunnit" without some good murders? The violence and suggestions of violence are appropriate to the story. The shooting locations were excellent, the plot twists every bit as good as the book. Not sure why some critics panned it. I would say go watch the movie, form your own opinions and don't let any priest tell you what you should/should not watch. I would see it again. br /

1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:

Entertaining, 2008-08-20
I particularly welcome the exposure the film gives to the denigration of women by the Catholic Church and the role of Mary Magdalene in church history. While The Da Vinci Code never reaches its full potential as a compelling work of art, it is solid entertainment that creates awareness of the differences within the early church and may spur people to read apocryphal writings such as the Gnostic Gospels and The Gospel of Thomas. Of course, the theory, first expounded in the book Holy Blood, Holy Grail by Michael Baigent and Richard Leigh, is out of the mainstream, yet, it is not as preposterous as Roger Ebert has claimed. Given the paucity of historical records referring to a historical Jesus and the passing of two thousand years, it is no more implausible than many other theological notions, widely accepted as the unvarnished truth. Anyway, all questions are answered and you are not left hanging. Whether you agree with the answers is up to you. Remember, it's only a movie, and it's never too late to become a history buff and you can do your own research.