The Dark Knight

0 of 0 people found the following review helpful:

A comic book without pictures, 2009-01-05
The first few pages recap what happened in Batman Begins. However, the novel takes a while before it starts with the events of the Dark Knight. The novel contains only two new scenes; one detailing how Scarecrow escaped and what he was doing in the meantime leading up to his appearance in The Dark Knight. The second scene is a little more interesting; it's about Bruce looking up info on Harvey Dent and this gives us some background on Dent. However, most of the characters in the novel are just names attached to big blocks of dialogue. br / br /The characters have "dialogue vomit", i.e. they just spit out large blocks of dialogue at a time, without pausing, making a gesture or revealing their inner thoughts. When Dent is in the alley with Schiff, Harvey argues with Batman and says "you can't give in" but again it's simply dialogue with no emotion and no exclamation marks! Also it seems to me that there were extra big spaces in between paragraphs as if they were trying to make the book longer (it's 292 pages). Once you start reading this novel you get the idea that Dennis O' Neil was not allowed to see the film, didn't care or was too busy. I strongly suspect the first reason. Writing a novel based on a film is a difficult task since the writer is working from a script that changes during filming. br / br /For example, during the mob meeting some of the lines are spoken by different characters. The final battle with the Joker is different. In the novel Batman simply ties him up while Joker just says his speech which was superbly delivered on screen. Because O'Neil was working from just a script he misses a lot of the memorable lines and gestures from the movie. The party crashing scene is an example of this. There is no sense of terror as the Joker threatens the guests. (One interesting point in the novel is that the Joker's "laugh" is a mixture of laughing and crying). However one feels nothing because there is context or realism throughout the novel. br / br /However when Dennis O' Neil does write something it seems more like something that belongs in a comic book. For example, during the Dent fundraiser the Joker "tip toes" over to Rachel Dawes. In the novel the Joker tends to lean towards the cartoon Joker, and not the terrifying realistic Joker of the movie. br / br /This book seems more like a transcript rather than a novel. The novel was completed on or before February 2008, while the film wasn't released until July 2008. I can't believe that in the age of the computer O'Neil couldn't delete, insert or rewrite some new lines. Perhaps he was too busy or maybe he couldn't see the finished movie but this is a poor novelization without any enthusiasm or style. The characters simply deliver their lines and that's it. There is no new insight into the characters or the story. Christopher Nolan has managed to bring Batman and his universe into the real world while Dennis O'Neil manages to bring it back into the comic book world. Save your money and just enjoy the movie instead.

0 of 0 people found the following review helpful:

Emerges From The Shadows, 2008-12-07
The art of writing a movie tie-in can be difficult, if not impossible, since the author is working with a script that will be seen and heard, which obviously does not always translate to the novel form. br / br /Dennis O'Neil may have a little more field to maneuver around due to his past outstanding work with the Batman character and it shows here. He does a solid job in presenting the movie version of the main characters, while delving into background material for a new generation of fans, with a bit of a twist for those who enjoyed the flick. br / br /Being "Based On" the movie may be passed over by some readers, who will then find the book a bit of a disappointment, since it isn't the complete novelization of the film. But O'Neil packs a punch in this exploration of the shadows that equally haunt the iconic superhero and one of his greatest foes. br / br /

0 of 0 people found the following review helpful:

This Book Is Not A Movie, 2008-11-16
This book was not ment to be made into a movie, however it is based on one. The author seems to have written this book in a rush. The movie is much better, but for the essential Batman fan, this book explains some of the hidden details and background information that helps explain the movie in greater detail.

0 of 0 people found the following review helpful:

Nice companion to the film, 2008-11-13
I love the film so I figured I'd read the paperback. In the book, you get a little more insight into the characters and a little more background on the story. It's not a word-for-word copy of the script for the film so you'll be getting a few things different. br / br /An easy read and an entertaining read.

0 of 0 people found the following review helpful:

Super Reader, 2008-11-13
The novel opens with some characters reminiscing about how they got to where they are. Bruce Wayne on al Ghul and becoming Batman, the Scarecrow on his current predicament, the Chechen crimelord, and even Rachel. br / br /After that, it is very similar to the movie. Batman, Gordon, and Harvey Dent, the new District Attorney have squeezed the local mobs until their cash flow is going to dry up. br / br /Put a green-haired white-faced wild card appears on the occasion, ripping off the mobsters, and offering the criminals a plan, or at least anarchy. br / br /The problem is that following a psychotic crazed untraceable lunatic might be worse than being broke and hunted by The Dark Knight. br / br /Gotham descends into terror again as the struggle between a few good men and the Joker continues, with the latter trying to break the public totally, and the Batman trying to stop him. br / br / br /3.5 out of 5